Has radiometric dating ever been wrong latest dating site in ghana
However, scientists from the Paleochronology Group, who perform research relating to “anomalies of science”, maintain that dinosaurs did not die out millions of years ago and that there is substantial evidence that they were still alive as recently as 23,000 years ago.
Until recently, Carbon-14 dating was never used to test dinosaur bones, as the analysis is only reliable up to 55,000 years.
Nevertheless Richard Leakey continued to fight for this original date. One gave an age of 1.6 million years and the other, where skull 1470 was found, gave 1.82 million years—both considerably younger than the five previous studies had reported.
The finding radically suggests that early humans may have once walked the earth with the fearsome reptiles thousands of years ago.
I understand calibration might have something to do with this, but then in the article it says in italicized words that the uncalibrated date “Must Always Be Mentioned”. CMI’s Dr Rob Carter responds: Anthony, As a fan of biblical archaeology, I was asked to address your question.
But when I read articles about the results, they never mention the uncalibrated data, which could actually be correct. I am not an expert in every subject that impinges on the discussion, but I will do my best.
Answer – none of those in attendance would have doubted what Jesus said.
You don’t even doubt today – even though the promises made by Jesus have not been fulfilled to this day.Examples: For all of these, and more, reasons, calibration is needed in C-14 dating.